📘 Uncategorized

You will choose one mental health disorder. This could be one of the following, or another not mentioned here.: Depression (low mood) Bipolar Disorder Generalised Anxiety Disorder Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Social Anxiety Disorde

TO Topessayz Expert · 📅 1 May 2026 · ⏱ 11 min read
✍️ Need help with this assignment? Get expert quotes in minutes — free to submit. ✍️ Get Writing Help FREE

HWSC5006 Mental Health and Wellbeing Across the Life Course Assessment Brief 2026 | Oxford

Word Count 3,000

HWSC 5006 Assessment Brief

Module code and title:

HWSC 5006
Mental Health and Wellbeing Across the Life Course

Module leader:

 

Neil Howie

Assignment type and word count:

Academic poster and written commentary – Equivalent to 3,000 combined submission words.

Assessment weighting:

100%

Submission time and date:

23:59 on Monday
4th May 2026

Target feedback time and date:

23:59 on Sunday
 7th June 2026

Outline of the task

This assignment requires the creation of a poster and a written commentary focused on a selected mental health disorder. The written commentary is a required component of the assessment and must be submitted alongside the poster. 

The poster should demonstrate an understanding of the disorder's diagnosis, available treatment options, the legal and policy frameworks that shape mental health care, and the relevance of a behaviour change approach to supporting improved outcomes. 

The written commentary enables expansion of the points made on the poster and also will include a comparison of treatments for different disorders, considering the challenges and reasons for different treatment approaches and critically discuss the strength and limitations of current legislation and policy for an individual living with the mental disorder. 

This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes:

LO1

Explain different treatment modalities for improved outcomes in mental health.

LO2

Appraise a range of mental health disorders and approaches to treatment

LO3

Critique current legislation and policy relevant to mental health services.

Suggested Framework to structure the task

Overview of Assignment:

For this assignment, you are required to produce an individual academic poster and a written commentary. Together, these components will demonstrate your ability to analyse and communicate key aspects of a specific mental health disorder from both clinical and socio-legal perspectives.

The academic poster should provide a clear, evidence-based visual summary of your chosen disorder. It must outline the diagnostic features, describe current treatment approaches, and introduce relevant legislation and policy frameworks that shape care delivery. This will address Learning Outcomes 1 and 2, which focus on explaining treatment modalities that support improved mental health outcomes and appraising a range of disorders and treatment approaches.

The written commentary should expand on the content of the poster, offering a more detailed and critical discussion. Drawing on academic sources and policy documents, you should critique the current state of care, assess the appropriateness of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions (LO2), and evaluate how legislation and national policy influence mental health service delivery. In doing so, you will demonstrate achievement of Learning Outcome 3, which requires the critique of relevant mental health legislation and policy.

Your commentary should also include a reflective section, considering how your understanding of mental ill-health and treatment frameworks informs your professional responsibilities within health and social care. This reflective element supports the development of academic literacy, research literacy, and critical self-awareness – core graduate attributes underpinning this module.

Assignment Task:

You will choose one mental health disorder. This could be one of the following, or another not mentioned here.:

  • Depression (low mood)
  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Generalised Anxiety Disorder
  • Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
  • Social Anxiety Disorder
  • Anorexia Nervosa
  • Bulimia Nervosa
  • Schizophrenia
  • First Episode Psychosis 
  • Alcohol Dependency
  • Illicit Drug Dependency (e.g. heroin, cocaine)
  • ADHD
  • Borderline Personality Disorder

Assignment Format:

The poster and written commentary should be submitted to Moodle as one word doc. The poster can be on a power point slide, then pasted onto the word document, with your written commentary following.

Poster and written commentary assessment

REMEMBER: The poster should only contain key points and be visually appealing, keep the amount of text to key points only. You can include graphs, pictures etc as appropriate. You will be expanding on these key points in your written commentary

Sections of your poster should include 

Overview of the selected mental health condition 

This section could include some of the following topics

  • Compare how different sources define the condition and explain any similarities or differences you find.
  • Explore how the definition has changed over time — what does this tell us about how our understanding has developed?
  • Discuss whether the name or language used to describe the disorder might create stigma.
  • Evaluate if the number of cases reported could be affected by underdiagnosis or cultural bias.
  • Explore whether diagnosis rates differ by gender, age, or ethnicity — and suggest reasons why.
  • Consider how symptoms might overlap with other conditions — and how this could make diagnosis harder.

Question how reliable and valid the diagnostic criteria are (for example, is there a risk of people being mis- or under-diagnosed?)

Treatment approaches for the selected mental health condition 

This section could include some of the following topics

  • Assess how strong the evidence is for the main treatment options for this disorder.
  • Compare how different treatments vary in effectiveness, side effects, and how easy they are to access.
  • Discuss whether combining treatments (e.g. therapy + medication) works better than using them alone.
  • Explore how factors like age, culture, or personal preference can affect how suitable or successful a treatment is.
  • Evaluate whether the treatment is person-centred and adapted to the individual’s needs.
  • Critique how available these treatments are in current healthcare systems.

Legislation and policy frameworks shaping care delivery

  • What recent reviews or reports suggest change in how care is delivered?
  • How do current policies affect access to treatment, and the quality-of-care people receive?
  • Does current law protect the rights of service users well enough?

 Written Commentary: 

Use 12pt font (Arial or Calibri recommended), with 1.5 line spacing. Each section should be clearly titled and written in paragraphs.

Additional sections for written commentary

Comparing treatments for different disorders.

  • Compare treatments used for this disorder with treatments for other conditions.
  • Explain why treatments differ — do these differences come from evidence, stigma, or resource availability?
  • Analyse which treatments seem most and least effective, considering side effects, risk of relapse, and long-term outcomes
    Strengths and limitations of current legislation and policy for an individual with a mental disorder

Prompts to guide your analysis:

  • Evaluate whether policies improve access to appropriate services for individuals with this disorder.
  • Assess how far legislation protects individual rights and identify any gaps or tensions.
  • Identify and appraise recent improvements in legislation and policy that are likely to benefit individuals.
  • Discuss areas where changes are required to ensure legislation and policy better support individuals with this disorder.

Reflection (This section can be written in the first person)

  • How will you use your understanding of mental ill-health and treatment frameworks from this module to inform your future professional responsibilities within health and social care.
  • How could you use a behaviour change approach to support an individual with a mental illness

Submission details

This assignment should be submitted electronically via Moodle (module lecturers will discuss this process with you during class time). 

  • All submitted work should remain anonymous; therefore, please ensure that you only include your student ID on your assignment.
  • You can submit your work as many times as you like before the submission date. If you submit your work more than once, the most recent version will replace your earlier submission.
  • Once you have submitted your work, you will receive a digital receipt as proof of submission, which will be sent to your forwarded e-mail address (provided you have set this up). Please keep this receipt for future reference, along with the original electronic copy of your assignment
  • You are reminded of GBS’s regulations on academic conduct, which can be viewed on: GBS Academic Good Practice and Academic Conduct: Policy and Procedure

Formatting Guidelines

This assessment should be submitted as a word document 

  • Assignment Template

oUse Arial font.
oSet the font size to 12pt for the main text.
oApply 1.5 or double spacing throughout the document.
oClearly indicate each part of the assessment, following the template structure
oOBU Harvard referencing should be applied throughout the assessment.

HWSC 5006 Marking Criteria

Criteria

Pass

Fail

100-85%

84-70%

69-60%

59-50%

49-40%

39-30%

29-0%

Poster presentation and content (LO1, LO2, LO3) (30%)

Summarises key points with clarity and originality, showing strong insight into how sources interconnect with each other and with the topic. Communicates findings with exceptional clarity and precision, using a professional style and format perfectly suited to the audience

Summarises the main ideas in own words, showing clear understanding of how sources connect with each other and the topic. Communicates findings clearly and precisely, adapting style and format appropriately for the intended audience

Provides accurate summaries in own words, showing clear links between different sources and their relevance to the topic. Communicates findings with precision and clarity, adapting style and tone effectively to suit the target audience

Summarises the main points in own words with general accuracy, beginning to show how sources link to one another and to the topic. Communicates findings clearly in most places, though style or format may not always be fully adapted for the audience

Summarises key points in own words with reasonable accuracy and begins to show how sources connect with each other.

Communicates findings in a mostly clear style, though precision or adaptation for audience may be inconsistent

Summarises information ineffectively, often relying on copying or paraphrasing with limited understanding, but with occasional signs of basic comprehension. Communicates findings in a very basic and unclear way, with style and format poorly suited to an academic audience, though some information may still be conveyed.

Does not summarise information effectively, relying on copying or showing no understanding of the material. Does not communicate findings clearly; style and format are unsuitable for any academic audience, preventing meaningful communication.

Understanding of the Mental Health Disorder (Poster and written Commentary) (20%)

Demonstrates a highly developed and critically informed understanding of the chosen mental health disorder. Commentary shows strong critical insight, strong critical evaluation, and synthesis of high-quality academic sources. Critically evaluates contemporary data, integrating information to inform practice.

 

20- 18 marks

Demonstrates a deep and critical understanding of the chosen mental health disorder. Explains diagnostic features and criteria with accuracy and sophistication, drawing on current classifications (e.g. DSM/ICD). Integrates up-to-date epidemiological data and interprets its significance clearly. Shows insight into how diagnosis and prevalence data inform approaches to treatment and service delivery.

 

17 – 15 marks

Shows a very good level of understanding of the chosen disorder. Accurately describes diagnostic features and criteria with only minor omissions. Makes very effective use of relevant and current statistics, with interpretation of their meaning. Very good consideration of how diagnosis and prevalence data link to treatment or service implications.

 

14 – 12 marks

Provides a good explanation of the disorder and its diagnostic features. Demonstrates general accuracy but may include some errors or lack detail in places. Uses some relevant statistics and, shows some good awareness of links between diagnosis, prevalence, and treatment.

 

11 – 9 marks

 

Provides a satisfactory description of the disorder,. Some information on diagnostic features is included but lacks precision. There is some good use of statistics and some attempt to connect diagnosis and prevalence with treatment or services.

 

8 – 6 marks

Shows minimal or incorrect understanding of the disorder. Little or no accurate information about diagnostic features or criteria. Statistics are missing, inaccurate, or irrelevant. No meaningful consideration of how diagnosis relates to treatment or services.

 

5 – 3 marks

 

Demonstrates little or no understanding of the disorder, information is incorrect, missing or unrelated

 

2 – 0 marks

Analysis of Policy and Legislation

(Poster and Written Commentary) (20%)

 

Synthesises specialist and inter-disciplinary information about mental health legislation and policy with exceptional depth, producing highly original and innovative proposals about policy changes needed.

Synthesises specialist and related information about mental health legislation and policy effectively, developing proposals about policy changes that are coherent and well-structured

Draws together specialist and inter-related knowledge about mental health legislation and policy to construct proposals about policy change that are both innovative and contextually relevant

Synthesises relevant specialist information about mental health legislation and policy with reasonable effectiveness, producing proposals about policy change that are mostly coherent

Combines information from a limited range of sources, with proposals about policy change that are basic but relevant

Synthesises information or ideas about mental health legislation and policy only minimally, with attempts that are unclear, incomplete, or weakly connected to the topic.

Does not synthesise information or ideas about mental health legislation and policy in any meaningful way; responses may be disconnected, irrelevant, or absent.

 

 

Comparison of treatment options

(15%)

Evaluates the significance of evidence about different treatment options with sophistication, integrating multiple perspectives seamlessly

Evaluates credibility, validity, and significance with strong reasoning and clear justification of different treatment options

Examines the significance of evidence in complex contexts with clear justification and logical reasoning about different treatment options

Evaluates credibility and validity of findings with some critical insight of different treatment options

Partial evaluation of credibility, validity, or significance of evidence about different treatment options

Provides minimal or superficial evaluation of credibility, validity, or significance of the evidence of different treatment options often with weak or partially incorrect reasoning.

Provides no evaluation of credibility, validity, or significance of the evidence of different treatment options.

Written Commentary Structure and Argument (15%)

Structures ideas into a seamless, logical flow that strengthens the argument and demonstrates sophisticated organisation. Critically evaluates the credibility and usefulness of sources with exceptional accuracy, explaining in detail how this affects conclusions

Organises ideas in a logical structure that supports arguments clearly and makes them easy to follow. Evaluates sources for credibility and usefulness, providing clear reasons why some are more trustworthy than others

Develops a logical structure where ideas build on each other smoothly, making the argument clear and persuasive  

Assesses the strengths and weaknesses of sources with sound reasoning, showing why certain ones carry more weight in conclusions

Presents ideas in a mostly logical order, with clear organisation though some parts could flow more smoothly. Identifies aspects of source credibility and usefulness

Organises ideas in a clear structure with mostly logical flow, though minor lapses may occur. Makes some evaluation of credibility and usefulness, though explanations may be general or lack

Plagiarism Free Assignment Help

Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms

  • Native UK, USA & Australia writers
  • 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin report included
  • Deadline from 3 hours
  • Unlimited free revisions
  • Free to submit — compare quotes
TO
Topessayz Expert
Academic Expert · Topessayz

Expert academic writer and education specialist helping students in the UK, USA, and Australia achieve their best results.

Need help with your own assignment?

Our expert writers can help you apply everything you've just read — to your actual assignment, brief, and marking criteria.

Get Expert Help Now →
📝 Free Submission — No Card Required

Need Help With This Assignment?

Our verified experts deliver 100% original, plagiarism-free work to your exact brief and marking criteria. Submit free — compare quotes — choose your expert.

Write My Assignment FREE Get A Free Quote →

No credit card · No commitment · First quote in minutes