NCO111 Tutor-Marked Assignment 01
This assignment is worth 60% of the final mark for NCO111 Work and Learning in a Changing World. This is an individual assignment.
The cut-off date for this assignment is on:
| T-Group | TMA01 Submission Deadline (2355hrs) |
| T01, T02, T03, T04, T05, T06, T07, T08, T09, T10 | 14 June 2026 |
Pick a political or business figure of your choice and comment on how he/she might react to the key insights of the NCO111 study guide. Your answer must take the form of an essay.
Additional Guidelines
- You must correctly identify the key insights of the NCO111 study guide and carefully examine the key ideas, beliefs, and/or actions of your chosen political or business figure. Ask yourself this question: given that my chosen figure holds such ideas/beliefs and has taken such actions, how might he/she possibly react to the key insights of the NCO111 study guide?
- In your essay, you must explain your reasoning clearly and substantiate your arguments with relevant and concrete evidence (e.g. quotations, statistics, specific examples, specific case studies, etc.) drawn from an adequate number of sources (e.g. newspaper articles, academic journal articles, books, etc.).
- Your essay should not exceed 800 words (excluding in-text citations and the bibliography).
Please declare the word count at the end of your essay.
- Please use font size 12 and 5 line spacing.
- Please use APA style for your in-text citations and your bibliography. See the examples below:
Example of an in-text citation
Large tech companies have been accused of having “too much power — too much power over our economy, our society, and our democracy” (Warren, 2019).
Example of a reference in the bibliography
- Warren, E. (2019, March 8). Here’s how we can break up Big Tech. Medium.
- https://medium.com/@teamwarren/heres-how-we-can-break-up-big-tech-9ad9e0da324c
- You can find more information on APA citation style here:
- https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html.
Marking Criteria
| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Average | Needs Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Articulation of Arguments (10 marks) |
All of the writer’s arguments are clear, easily identifiable, coherent, and relevant to the needs of the question.
Excellent (8-10 marks) |
For the most part, the writer’s arguments are clear, easily identifiable, coherent, and relevant to the needs of the question.
But the writer falls short of an “Excellent” grade because a few arguments are unclear/buried, confused/incoherent, and/or irrelevant to the needs of the question. Good (6-7 marks) |
. A large number of the writer’s arguments are unclear/buried, confused/incoherent, and/or irrelevant to the needs of the question or . The writer has articulated an insufficient number of arguments.Average (4-5 marks) |
. There are no arguments in the essay. or . The writer’s arguments are completely irrelevant to the needs of the question.Needs Work (0-3 marks) |
| Use of Evidence (40 marks) |
. The writer has adduced an impressive amount of relevant, clear, detailed, accurate, and non-generic evidence (e.g. quotations, statistics, specific examples, etc.) in support of his/her arguments. . The evidence is of such high quality that the reader is highly likely to find the writer’s arguments to be persuasive. . The writer has provided clear and comprehensible citations as and where necessary.Excellent (30-40 marks) |
For the most part, the writer has backed up his/her arguments with relevant, clear, detailed, accurate, and non-generic evidence (e.g. quotations, statistics, specific examples, etc.).
But the writer falls short of an “Excellent” grade due to (any of) the following reasons: . A few arguments are not sufficiently backed with evidence. Good (24-29 marks) |
The writer will be awarded an “Average” grade for this row of the rubric if his/her essay displays any of the following weaknesses:
. A large number of the writer’s arguments are not sufficiently backed with evidence. Average (16-23 marks) |
. The writer did not back up his/her points with any evidence at all. or . The evidence produced by the writer is completely irrelevant to his/her arguments and/or the needs of the question.Needs Work (0-15 marks) |
| Analysis / Engagement with NCO111 Study Guide (50 marks) |
. The writer demonstrates a sophisticated and accurate understanding of the key insights of the tma study guide. . The reactions suggested by the writer are grounded in clear, coherent, logical, and sophisticated engagement with the key insights of the study guide. . The writer’s analysis is of such high quality that the reader is highly likely to find the writer’s arguments to be persuasive.Excellent (38-50 marks) |
For the most part, the reactions suggested by the writer are grounded in clear, logical, and thoughtful engagement with the key insights of the tma study guide.
But the writer falls short of an “Excellent” grade due to (any of) the following reasons: . He/she misidentified or misunderstood some of the key insights of the study guide. Good (30-37 marks) |
The writer will be awarded an “Average” grade for this row of the rubric if his/her essay displays any of the following weaknesses:
. The writer misidentified or misunderstood a large number of the key insights of the study guide. Average (20-29 marks) |
. There is no analysis in the essay. or . The writer’s analytical insights are completely irrelevant to the needs of the question.Needs Work (0-19 marks) |
— END OF ASSIGNMENT —
Struggling with NCO111 Work and Learning in a Changing World TMT 01?
Native Singapore Writers Team
- 100% Plagiarism-Free Essay
- Highest Satisfaction Rate
- Free Revision
- On-Time Delivery
The post NCO111 Work and Learning in a Changing World Tutor-Marked Assignment 01 Brief 2026 appeared first on Singapore Assignment Help.