Assessment: Case Study Analysis

Case 1: The global pharmaceutical industry: world saviour or loathed pariah? [pages 549 – 560 of the 13th Edition]

Case 2: Mars’ and Nestlé’s diversification into veterinary clinics [PAGES 644]. [pages 644 – 651 of the 13th Edition]

This case studies can be found in the case study section of the 13th Edition of the prescribed reading. You can access this using the link on Moodle in the Resources section.

Whittington et al (2020) Exploring Strategy: Text and Cases 13th edition

This assessment contributes 90% of your final mark for this module and you are required to analyse two case studies on the global pharmaceutical industry and Mars’ and Nestlé’s.

When answering the case questions below only use information the global pharmaceutical industry and Mars’ and Nestlé’s.contained in the case study. Your marks will be penalised if you use information on the company from alternative sources as it is your assessment of the case information provide which is being assessed.

You are to answer the questions in a report format.  Hence, your report should consist of executive summary, table of content, headings, subheadings, tables and figures, and reference list. Avoid bullet points

Questions

Drawing on your knowledge of the PESTEL model, analyse the external environment facing global pharmaceutical industry and identify the key external factors which impact on the company. (15%)Using Porter’s Five Forces framework, analyse the attractiveness of the global pharmaceutical industry. Support your analysis with evidence from the global pharmaceutical industry case study (25%)Using Porter’s Generic Strategies, analyse the competitive strategy employed by Mars and Nestlé. Support your analysis with evidence from the case study. (25%)Using the Ansoff’s matrix, analyse the direction of growth that Mars and Nestlé has undertaken to grow their business. Provide recommendations for the firm’s future growth. (25%)

Mark allocated for the presentation of analysis, use of case evidence and conclusions. (10%)

The requirements for the assessment

Case study analysis – report  

This assessment contributes 90% of your final mark for this module and you are required to analyse two case studies on the global pharmaceutical industry and Mars’ and Nestlé’s.

When answering the case questions below only use information the global pharmaceutical industry and Mars’ and Nestlé’s.contained in the case study. Your marks will be penalised if you use information on the company from alternative sources as it is your assessment of the case information provide which is being assessed.

You are to answer the questions in a report format.  Hence, your report should consist of executive summary, table of content, headings, subheadings, tables and figures, and reference list. Avoid bullet points.

Assessment Presentation Information

As you prepare your case analysis there are a few other points you must take into account:

A case analysis is not a conceptual explanation or discussion so do not spend too much time on conceptual explanation, instead your focus should be on how the concepts are used to analyse the case events and reach evaluative judgments.Always draw on evidence from the case to support your analysis and conclusions. Using evidence without analysis will amount to describing what has happened in the case and will not gain many marks.It is critically important that if you use quotes from the case or academic texts, you do so selectively and they must be placed in quotation marks and referenced appropriately.

You should answer the questions in terms of the information presented in the case up to the time of publication. You are not required to go beyond the case end date since your analysis and judgement are being assessed at this point, not in the light of subsequent events. As a result, you should not include references on the pharmaceutical industry and Mars and Nestlé from sources other than those contained in the case.

Guidance Notes

The assessment feedback sheet provides the marking criteria for the overall case analysis. Adjust the length of your answers to reflect the % weighting allocated to each question. Remember that in writing your solution to the questions you must not describe what the case says but use the concepts to analyse the information and use the evidence/facts in the case to support your analysis.

To answer question 1 you need to review the PESTEL framework (Units 1 and 2). Specifically, the external political, economic, social, technological, ecological and legal trends that could impact the future of the Pharmaceutical Industry. At this stage, do not focus too much on how various players have managed to protect their strategic position because this requires an analysis of its internal capabilities and how they are utilised to establish a position in the industry which you are asked to discuss in question 2.

To answer question 2, you need to review Porter’s Five Forces model (Unit 2). Specifically, the five forces which enable you to determine the overall attractiveness of the global pharmaceutical industry within which the key players of the global pharmaceutical industry operates.

In question 3, you need to review Porter’s Generic Strategies framework (Unit 4). Specifically, you will need to examine the competitive strategy that Mars and Nestlé has employed to position itself against its rivals and to create value. Amongst the various options outlined by Porter’s Generic Strategies are cost leadership and differentiation strategies.

Question 4 focuses on how Mars and Nestlé have used their capabilities to grow the business. You are asked to focus on the options in Ansoff’s matrix which are explained in your textbook and in Unit 5. The options include market penetration, market development, product development and diversification. You also need to make recommendations on how Mars and Nestlé should use their existing capabilities to implement future growth options.

In questions 3 and 4, you can make use of figures in your answer, especially to describe the relevant frameworks.

Unit Aims

The aim of this unit is to develop learners’ understanding of legislative frameworks that contributed to design on risk assessment plans in organisations and learn the basics of ISO standards. ISO is a universally recognised international standard that provides principles and guidelines on risk management. These standards provide principles, a framework, and a process for managing risk that can be used by any organisation. The learners will become aware of the principles of the ISO standards.

Learning Outcomes – the learner will:Assessment Criteria – the learner can:1. Understand risk management principles.1.1  Define risk in an organisational context.

1.2  Explain risk management in an organisational context.

1.3  Evaluate three stage risk management process in an organisational context.

1.4  Assess the importance of effective risk management.

1.5  Critically evaluate five basic methods for risk management

2. Understand key legislation frameworks that influence risk management decision making in an organisation.2.1  Describe five legislative factors that influence health and safety risk assessment considerations.

2.2  Analyse the influence of relevant legislation, legal factors and regulatory bodies on health and safety in an organisation of your choice.

2.3  Evaluate the importance of legislative framework on risk management in your chosen organisation.

3. Evaluate the scope and implications of risk management standards.3.1  Critically evaluate the scope of relevant ISO standards in your chosen organisation.

3.2  Assess the focal points of ISO standards ‘harmonisation’ programmes and its impact on your chosen organisation.

3.3  Examine the application of ISO standards in managing risks in an organisation.

Scenario:

You are employed as a Trainee Operations Manager in a Private Health Care Clinic in London. The company provides health care services to a growing list of private clients. The clinic is planning to open a new branch in Birmingham. The Managing Director has asked you to lead a small team from the office and involve consultants to plan and execute this new branch opening.

Task 1 of 1: Management Report

The Managing Director has asked you to prepare a report which should reassure the senior management team your capability in dealing with the venture.

To develop your Management Report, you must apply relevant theoretical concepts, models and Principles of Risk Management, relate them with real world examples of given organisational context and critically analyse your arguments and arrive at justifiable recommendations

Instructions:

The following requirements need to be addressed when preparing the report:

Section A (ACs 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5)

Define risk in the organisation’s context.Explain risk management in the organisation’s context.Evaluate three stage risk management You should connect it to your organisation’s context.Assess the importance of effective risk management in the organisation’s context.Critically evaluate five basic methods for risk management that you believe will be helpful in your organisation’s context.Want to Get Management Assignment Help Services at an Affordable Price?

Section B (ACs 2.1, 2.2, 2.3)

Describe five legislative factors that influence health and safety risk assessment considerations.Analyse the influence of relevant legislation, legal factors and regulatory bodies on health and safety in the organisation.Evaluate the importance of legislative framework on risk management in the organisation.

Section C (ACs 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6)

Critically evaluate the scope of relevant ISO standards on the organisation.Assess the focal points of ISO standards ‘harmonisation’ programmes and its impact on the organisation.Examine the application of ISO standards in managing risks in the organisation.

Case Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

This course contains five Case Analysis assignments. You should begin working on these early. It is very important to focus on continuous improvement throughout the course. Failure to make corrections based on the instructor’s feedback for each case analysis will result is a significantly lower score in subsequent case. Therefore, based on the instructor’s feedback on each case, you are expected to exhibit continuous improvement in each of the following cases.

There are basic rules about a case analysis to follow. First, do not submit them in question and answer format which is not appropriate for case analyses. Your case analyses must be composed in essay format and adhere to the following APA style and formatting guidelines, which will help ensure a solid grade on your first case analysis.

 

1.      Include a title page containing case name, course identification, date, your name, and your instructor’s name.

2.      An abstract is not necessary in a short case analysis.

3.      Write your case analysis in essay style with a tabbed first line in each paragraph. Make sure to address each case question thoroughly. You are suggested to commit a minimum of one paragraph to answer each question, two if necessary.

4.      The content of your analysis must be at least 1,000 words. This does not include the title page, main document, and sources in the Reference section.

5.      The case analysis must include at least three heading sections such as Introduction or Background, Current Issues or Issues Addressed, and Conclusion or Recommendations. The names of the headings are at your discretion but must help the reader better understand your analysis.

6.      The document must be double-spaced, the font must be in Arial, Courier, or Times New Roman, and the font size must be 12-point. There should be no extra white space anywhere in your document which includes line breaks and/or page breaks. The document must have one inch margins all around.

7.      Include a References section with your sources. Do not use the terms Bibliography or Works Cited.

8.      Include and cite at least three scholarly sources for each case, and list these in the References section. There must also be at least five citations throughout your document with at least one being a “direct quote.”

 

The aforementioned items must be followed in all assigned cases. Not adhering to these guidelines will result in deductions from your overall score. Hence, all of the aforementioned factors are used in grading your cases. Additionally, the rubric on the following page will be used to grade your case analysis. You are strongly recommended to print this document for reference.

 

Submit the assigned Case Analysis to the Dropbox no later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT of the module in which it is due. (Each Dropbox basket is linked to Turnitin.)

 

Case Analysis Grading Rubric

 

Ratings:

Exceptional corresponds to an A (90-100). Performance is outstanding; significantly above the usual expectations.

Proficient corresponds to a grade of B- to B+ (80-89%). Skills are at the level of expectation.

Basic corresponds to a C to C+ (70-79%). Skills are acceptable but improvements are needed to meet expectations well. Novice corresponds to a D to C- (60-69%). Performance is weak; the skills are not sufficiently demonstrated at this time. 0 This criterion is missing or not in evidence.

 

 

Competency

Ratings and Points

0

Novice

Basic

Proficient

Exceptional

1. Proficiency, Knowledge,
and Research Depth (20% of total score)

 

 

 

 

 

 

0-11

Does not
use readings and research sources
to support
premises.

 

 

 

12-13

Alludes to the readings and research sources to support
premises.

 

 

 

14-15

Refers to specific examples and theories from the readings to support premises.

 

 

16-17

Supports premises with specific examples and theories from a diverse source of readings and research sources.

 

18-20

2. Synthesis, Analysis, and Comprehension (20% of total score)

 

 

 

 

 

0-11

Does not integrate personal observations or knowledge.

 

 

12-13

Integrates personal observations and knowledge in a cursory manner.

 

14-15

Integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate way.

 

16-17

Integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate and highly insightful way.

 

18-20

3. Demonstration of Theory Knowledge and Usage

(25% of total score)

 

 

 

 

0-14

Theoretical terminology is ignored or misused.

 

 

15-16

Terminology partially matches
the textbook and class material.

 

17-19

Terminology matches the textbook and class material completely.

 

20-22

Terminology matches. Messages are

crisp and persuasive.

 

23-25

4. Organization, formulation, logic, and Identification of Key Points

(15% of total score)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0-8

Content is disorganized, points of response are not distinct, and information is not logically sequenced.

 

 

9

Content is somewhat disorganized, points of response are
distinct, but information is not logically sequenced.

 

 

10-11

Content is organized, points of response are distinct, and
information is logically sequenced.

 

 

 

12-13

Content is organized, points of response are distinct, and information is logically sequenced; key points
are made obvious.

 

14-15

 

5. Grammar, Composition, Word Choice,
Sentence Structure, and Terminology

(10% of total score)

 

 

 

 

 

0-5

Word choice and sentence structure are not suitable for university level
work.

 

6

Word choice and sentence structure are not suitable for graduate level
work.

 

7

Word choice and sentence structure are suitable for graduate level work.

 

8

Word choice and sentence structure are suitable for graduate level work.

 

9-10

6. Formatting, Layout,

& APA Style

(10% of total score)

 

 

 

 

 

0-5

Regular grammar, composition, and APA errors that create
an obstacle.

 

6

Periodic grammar, composition, and APA errors.

 

 

7

Minimal grammar, composition, and APA errors.

 

 

8

Errors are rare.

 

 

 

 

9-10

Total

100

 

Note: Competencies 1-3 account for 65% of the total score; competencies 4-6 account for 35% of the total score.

Articulate his/her philosophy of classroom management.

Key Components in a Philosophy of Classroom Management:
Consistency and fairness: Whether using rewards, consequences, or other strategies, consistency is crucial.
Positive relationships: Building trust and respect between students and teachers is fundamental to many classroom management philosophies.
Student empowerment: Some approaches emphasize giving students more control and responsibility in their behavior and learning.
Cultural awareness: Teachers need to understand and respect the diverse backgrounds students bring to the classroom.
Teachers often blend these philosophies, creating a personalized approach to classroom management that aligns with their values, teaching style, and student needs.

Resources:

https://www.whyliveschool.com/blog/classroom-management-modelsLinks to an external site.

https://minds-in-bloom.com/introduction-to-champs/Links to an external site.

https://www.pbis.org/classroom-pbisLinks to an external site.

https://www.schoolsthatlead.org/blog/best-classroom-management-strategiesLinks to an external site.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiIcptKYNh4Links to an external site.

As technologies and the health care industry continue to evolve, remote care, diagnosis, and collaboration are becoming increasingly more regular methods by which nurses are expected to work. Learning the ways in which evidence-based models and care can help remote work produce better outcomes will become critical for success. Additionally, understanding how to leverage EBP principles in collaboration will be important in the success of institutions delivering quality, safe, and cost-effective care. It could also lead to better job satisfaction for those engaging in remote collaboration
Remote care and diagnosis is a continuing and increasingly important method for nurses to help deliver care to patients to promote safety and enhance health outcomes. Understanding best EBPs and building competence in delivering nursing care to remote patients is a key competency for all nurses. Additionally, in some scenarios, while you may be delivering care in person you may be collaborating with a physician or other team members who are remote. Understanding the benefits and challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration is vital to developing effective communication strategies when coordinating care. So, being proficient at communicating and working with remote health care team members is also critical to delivering quality, evidence-base care. you will propose an evidence- based plan to improve the outcomes the patient in the provided case study below, and examine how remote collaboration provided benefits or challenges to designing and delivering the care. Before you complete the instructions detailed in the courseroom, first review the case study below. INTRODUCTION Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a serious condition in which the heart doesn’t pump blood as efficiently as it should. Providing evidence-based care for CHF can be challenging, especially when care is being provided remotely. In this case study, we will observe how healthcare professionals collaborate remotely and virtually to provide care for a patient with CHF. PATIENT INFORMATION The patient is a 65-year-old male diagnosed with congestive heart failure. He lives in a rural area and has limited access to specialized cardiac care. The patient has a history of hypertension and has been experiencing symptoms such as shortness of breath, fatigue, and swelling in the legs. COLLABORATION PROCESS The patient’s primary care physician, Dr. Johnson, collaborates remotely with a team of healthcare professionals, including a cardiologist, a nurse, and a pharmacist, to provide evidence-based care for CHF. • Dr. Johnson: “Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining this virtual meeting to discuss the care of our patient with congestive heart failure. Based on the patient’s symptoms and medical history, I believe he would benefit from a comprehensive treatment plan. I would like to hear your input and recommendations.” • Cardiologist: “Thank you, Dr. Johnson. I have reviewed the patient’s medical records and echocardiogram results. I agree that the patient has congestive heart failure and requires a comprehensive treatment plan. I recommend initiating medication therapy, including ACE inhibitors and diuretics, to manage his symptoms and improve cardiac function.” • Nurse: “I have been monitoring the patient’s vital signs remotely and have noticed fluctuations in blood pressure and weight. I suggest implementing a telemonitoring system to closely monitor the patient’s condition and provide timely interventions when Be sure you mention any articles, authors, and other relevant sources of evidence that helped inform your video. Discuss why these sources of evidence are credible and relevant. Important: You are required to submit an APA-formatted reference list of the sources you cited specifically in your video or used to inform your presentation. You are required to submit a narrative of all your video content to this assessment and to SafeAssign. The following media is an example learner submission in which the speaker successfully addresses all competencies in the assessment. Make sure that your video addresses the following grading criteria: Propose your own evidence-based care plan to improve the safety and outcomes for a patient in the provided case study. Explain the ways in which you used an EBP model to help develop your plan of care for the client. Reflect on which evidence you found in your search that was most relevant and useful when making decisions regarding your care plan. Identify benefits and strategies to mitigate the challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration to plan care within the context of a remote team. Communicate in a professional manner that is easily audible and uses proper grammar, including a reference list formatted in current APA style References: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements. APA reference page: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style. Submit a narrative of all of your video content.

Instructions: Students will identify gaps in the current research from the Literature Review and formulate a potential research question which would, if answered, advance the knowledge for generalist practice in the selected topic. Student will refine and formulate one or two focused research questions for their proposed study. Students will submit a 1-page double spaced document with the short social problem background, the research question, and the importance of answering the question. Please include references Requirements A one-page document with the short social problem background, the research question, and the importance of answering the question. APA format I did attach my literature review paper

Assignment #4: Population and Sample Due: October 21, 2024 Instructions: Students will identify and describe the population and sample for the planned research proposal based on the field practicum and identified social problem/research interest. Include in your paper: how you expect to select your sample, based on the research method you are using; size of the population (N); and the proposed size of the sample (n). Students are to define their population and sample in detail explaining why the particular population and sample size were chosen. Requirements: Submit a 1-2-page paper describing your population and sample. APA format Submitted via CANVAS submission link. The social problem/research interest Gun Violence among Teens, Young Adults, and Middle-Aged in the United States.

Alexander’s legacy has long been a matter of debate. Cleitarchus, a fourth-century (BCE) historian from Alexandria, portrays the king as a cruel, paranoid alcoholic. Eratosthenes of Cyrene, a third century BCE scholar at the library of Alexandria, suggests that Alexander’s conquests opened the eyes of the Greeks to other civilizations, a view that stands in contrast with Plutarch’s assertion that the Macedonian king civilized Persians, Sogdians and others.1 In Pseudo-Callisthenes’ version of the legend of Alexander, on the other hand, nowhere does the hero articulate what is behind his all-consuming desire to master the world. This lack of vision and directness is particularly noticeable at the conclusion of Book II and more persistent in Book III. Could it be as the character of Ptolemy wistfully concludes in Oliver Stone’s film Alexander, “Alexander was blessed and cursed with an eternal unsatisfied longing, a pothos, even he could not fathom? Perpetually racing the gods, Alexander’s destiny remained exactly where it served him best, just out of reach?” • Consider the qualities, actions, and exploits of the Macedonian commander in PseudoCallisthenes’ Alexander Romance and determine whether Alexander deserves to be idolized as a charismatic leader. In responding to this question, you may consider the following: a. whether Alexander’s lack of vision ought to be attributed to Providence alone b. whether Pseudo-Callisthenes would have agreed with Stone’s statement above that almost justifies Alexander’s lack of vision, citing Providence and c. why the legend of Alexander continues to inspire and fascinate today EVALUATION CRITERIA: I will consider the following criteria in evaluating your paper: a. The clarity of your argument in the introduction and throughout the paper b. The effectiveness and depth of your thesis overall—its introduction, development, analysis, and argumentation c. Your engagement with the literature at hand d. The relevance of your evidence to claims you make e. Your facility with language, especially in relation of your claims f. Your facility with grammar and the conventions of critical writing WRITING MECHANICS: ➢ Your paper should be 5-7 pages in length, typed, double-spaced, and neatly presented. The font should be Times New Roman, size 12. ➢ Consult the MLA style for writing academic papers

Case Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

 This course contains five Case Analysis assignments. You should begin working on these early. It is very important to focus on continuous improvement throughout the course. Failure to make corrections based on the instructor’s feedback for each case analysis will result is a significantly lower score in subsequent case. Therefore, based on the instructor’s feedback on each case, you are expected to exhibit continuous improvement in each of the following cases.

 There are basic rules about a case analysis to follow. First, do not submit them in question and answer format which is not appropriate for case analyses. Your case analyses must be composed in essay format and adhere to the following APA style and formatting guidelines, which will help ensure a solid grade on your first case analysis.

1.      Include a title page containing case name, course identification, date, your name, and your instructor’s name.

2.      An abstract is not necessary in a short case analysis.

3.      Write your case analysis in essay style with a tabbed first line in each paragraph. Make sure to address each case question thoroughly. You are suggested to commit a minimum of one paragraph to answer each question, two if necessary.

4.      The content of your analysis must be at least 1,000 words. This does not include the title page, main document, and sources in the Reference section.

5.      The case analysis must include at least three heading sections such as Introduction or Background, Current Issues or Issues Addressed, and Conclusion or Recommendations. The names of the headings are at your discretion but must help the reader better understand your analysis.

6.      The document must be double-spaced, the font must be in Arial, Courier, or Times New Roman, and the font size must be 12-point. There should be no extra white space anywhere in your document which includes line breaks and/or page breaks. The document must have one inch margins all around.

7.      Include a References section with your sources. Do not use the terms Bibliography or Works Cited.

8.      Include and cite at least three scholarly sources for each case, and list these in the References section. There must also be at least five citations throughout your document with at least one being a “direct quote.”

 

The aforementioned items must be followed in all assigned cases. Not adhering to these guidelines will result in deductions from your overall score. Hence, all of the aforementioned factors are used in grading your cases. Additionally, the rubric on the following page will be used to grade your case analysis. You are strongly recommended to print this document for reference.

 

Submit the assigned Case Analysis to the Dropbox no later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT of the module in which it is due. (Each Dropbox basket is linked to Turnitin.)

 

Case Analysis Grading Rubric

 

Ratings:

Exceptional corresponds to an A (90-100). Performance is outstanding; significantly above the usual expectations.

Proficient corresponds to a grade of B- to B+ (80-89%). Skills are at the level of expectation.

Basic corresponds to a C to C+ (70-79%). Skills are acceptable but improvements are needed to meet expectations well. Novice corresponds to a D to C- (60-69%). Performance is weak; the skills are not sufficiently demonstrated at this time. 0 This criterion is missing or not in evidence.

 

 

Competency

Ratings and Points

0

Novice

Basic

Proficient

Exceptional

1. Proficiency, Knowledge,
and Research Depth (20% of total score)

 

 

 

 

 

 

0-11

Does not
use readings and research sources
to support
premises.

 

 

 

12-13

Alludes to the readings and research sources to support
premises.

 

 

 

14-15

Refers to specific examples and theories from the readings to support premises.

 

 

16-17

Supports premises with specific examples and theories from a diverse source of readings and research sources.

 

18-20

2. Synthesis, Analysis, and Comprehension (20% of total score)

 

 

 

 

 

0-11

Does not integrate personal observations or knowledge.

 

 

12-13

Integrates personal observations and knowledge in a cursory manner.

 

14-15

Integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate way.

 

16-17

Integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate and highly insightful way.

 

18-20

3. Demonstration of Theory Knowledge and Usage

(25% of total score)

 

 

 

 

0-14

Theoretical terminology is ignored or misused.

 

 

15-16

Terminology partially matches
the textbook and class material.

 

17-19

Terminology matches the textbook and class material completely.

 

20-22

Terminology matches. Messages are

crisp and persuasive.

 

23-25

4. Organization, formulation, logic, and Identification of Key Points

(15% of total score)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0-8

Content is disorganized, points of response are not distinct, and information is not logically sequenced.

 

 

9

Content is somewhat disorganized, points of response are
distinct, but information is not logically sequenced.

 

 

10-11

Content is organized, points of response are distinct, and
information is logically sequenced.

 

 

 

12-13

Content is organized, points of response are distinct, and information is logically sequenced; key points
are made obvious.

 

14-15

 

5. Grammar, Composition, Word Choice,
Sentence Structure, and Terminology

(10% of total score)

 

 

 

 

 

0-5

Word choice and sentence structure are not suitable for university level
work.

 

6

Word choice and sentence structure are not suitable for graduate level
work.

 

7

Word choice and sentence structure are suitable for graduate level work.

 

8

Word choice and sentence structure are suitable for graduate level work.

 

9-10

6. Formatting, Layout,

& APA Style

(10% of total score)

 

 

 

 

 

0-5

Regular grammar, composition, and APA errors that create
an obstacle.

 

6

Periodic grammar, composition, and APA errors.

 

 

7

Minimal grammar, composition, and APA errors.

 

 

8

Errors are rare.

 

 

 

 

9-10

Total

100

 

Note: Competencies 1-3 account for 65% of the total score; competencies 4-6 account for 35% of the total score.

Instructions
In a 4-5-page paper, please complete the following:
1. Assess your perspective on whether leadership is
a natural ability, a learned skill, or a response to a
challenge.
• Title this section, “Leadership Origin.”
2. Examine the role of a public leader, addressing
their responsibilities, impact on society,
challenges faced, and strategies for trust-
building.
• Title this section, “Public Leader.”
3. Recommend six characteristics that a competent
public administration leader should demonstrate,
supported by your reasoning. Please include:
• Two leadership traits.
• Two leadership behaviors.
• Two leadership styles.
• Title this section, “Leadership Traits,
Behaviors, and Styles.”
4. Examine how a skilled leader effectively applies
the Learning Behavior Theory to achieve
success.
• You may consider analyzing a successful
leader, such as Rosa Parks, Nelson
Mandela, Oprah Winfrey, Condoleezza
Rice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Desmond
Tutu, or Betty Friedan, among others.
• Title this section “T endershin Quecess “