MBA Management Economics Group Report Outline and Requirements
(30% of the final score)
Purpose of the report
The purpose of the group presentation is to provide students with an opportunity to reflect on and reinforce the economic concepts introduced in the course and to develop
Students need to use relevant economic concepts to analyze real-world problems.
The students will analyze the test methods, present the results in class, and submit a written report.
The position is not important. What matters most is the rationality of the explanation given, the analytical ability presented in the report, and the economic theory.
Therefore, when marking students’ reports, I will not have a preset position. As long as the students’ explanation is clear,
At the same time, the explanation given is consistent with the economic way of thinking, which is a good report.
Report text and introduction requirements
The report should be within 6,000 words. (Please list the number of words you have written. Points will be deducted for every 500 words over 6,500.
If the word count is less than 500, 5 points will be deducted. If the word count is less than 500, it will be counted as 500. If there is a dispute on the word count, I will count it on Microsoft Word.
In addition, you should list the references and sources of information after the report, and list the
(These are not included in the 6,000-word limit. The final score will be adjusted based on the quality of the student’s part.)
Each group needs to present the report in class. The report should be concise and clear in concept. The report can be presented by the group representative and
Or the whole team can introduce it together.
Finally, please read carefully the specific scoring criteria and academic integrity requirements listed after the report topic.
Submission date: within one week after the course ends
Report presentation and discussion time: To be determined
Submission Requirements:
1) Each team leader must upload the MS Work and PDF versions of the report to Tronclass within the specified time. (Please list the
The final score will be adjusted based on the quality of each student’s contribution.)
2) Each student should rate the performance of other students in the group and upload the ratings to Tronclass.
(The member’s score in the group report is calculated by multiplying the teacher’s score by the member’s self-assessment score.
Come.)
3) Before submitting the report, students must submit it to the Turnitin system for plagiarism check and submit the detailed plagiarism check report together with the final report.
Submit to Tronclass. Groups that fail to submit a plagiarism report as required will have their scores deducted. (If the plagiarism rate exceeds 20%, the entire class will be
Item will be treated as zero)
4) If the final report has been modified by AI, please indicate which content has been modified by AI and provide the original content without AI modification.
Edited document for comparison. Content written by AI without attribution will be considered plagiarism.
1
Academic Integrity
Plagiarism and cheating are serious violations of school rules and will be punished if found.
If the plagiarism rate exceeds 20%, the entire subject will be treated as zero. It should be emphasized that “checking for plagiarism” is not just a machine check.
For each report, a detailed manual check is conducted to detect plagiarism issues that cannot be detected by machines.
Plagiarism refers to the act of directly or indirectly including other people’s information, ideas or words in one’s own article without any
Whether the source is cited and quoted. Therefore, in addition to directly copying the entire article, section, paragraph or sentence without citing,
The following actions will also be considered plagiarism.
• Cutting and pasting articles from the Internet to create your own articles without citing the source or providing any citations.
• Simply replacing some words from someone else’s work and restating it in your own words without citing the source or making citations.
And it doesn’t show what your opinion is on the article.
• Simply translating from a foreign language without citing the source or making a reference, and without showing your contribution to the article
What are your views?
• Directly plagiarizing or imitating classmates’ reports, resulting in excessive similarity in content, or only changing the case content but not the writing style.
Excessive similarity, etc. If this happens, all overly similar or identical articles will be considered plagiarism and assessed.
Zero points without prior warning.
• If the final report has been modified by AI, please indicate which content has been modified by AI and provide the original
AI-edited documents are provided for comparison purposes. Content written by AI without proper citation will be considered plagiarism.
The topic of the report (subject to approval):
A. Analysis of actual cases or economic phenomena
Students can choose a real business situation in the past year and use the concepts of managerial economics to analyze the relevant
Your analysis should go beyond the facts described and draw some important conclusions and economic mechanisms to explain the market.
Other similar business decisions or economic phenomena in the market. The report should include the following items.
1. A description of the chosen business situation or economic problem.
2. Use economic theory to analyze selected business situations or economic problems.
3. Discuss whether your explanation can be extended to other similar business decisions or economic phenomena.
B. Literature review and review report
Select a literature on industrial organization theory published in the past two years and summarize and comment on it.
The report should include the following items.
1. Summarize the research questions and main results of the selected articles.
2. Explain the economic mechanism of the article’s results and comment on the rationality of the article.
3. Discuss whether the results of the article can be extended to other similar business decisions or economic phenomena.
2
Economics Literature Sources
English Literature
ＵｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙｏｆＰｅｄｉａｔｒｓｔｕｄｉｅｓ
ＵｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙｏｆＰｅｄｉａｔｒｏｌｅｕｍ
Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ
Journal of Political Economics
Quarterly Journal of Economics
ＵｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙｏｆＥｎｇｉｎｅｅｒｉｎｇ
ＵｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙｏｆＰｅｄｉａｔｒｏｌｅｕｍ（ＲAND）
Journal of Industrial Economics, International Journal of Industrial
Organization, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy.
Review of Industrial Organization, Journal of Law and Economics, Journal of
Regulatory Economics, Antitrust Bulletin, Management Science
Chinese Literature
Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ
Administering the world
ＵｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙｏｆＣｈｉｎａ
Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ
3
Written Report Scoring Criteria
Level Level Level Rating Standard
Code
Excellent 83%– A+, 1. Have a very clear understanding and description of the chosen business situation.
100% A, A- 2. Have excellent ability to apply economic theory to analyze cases.
3. The understanding of the economic concepts proposed is extremely accurate.
4. Use economic theory to conduct a very thorough analysis of the chosen business situation, and
The explanation provided is extremely appropriate.
5. All lines of writing are logical.
6. The explanations provided are broad in nature.
7. The cited literature is appropriate and regular.
8. The entire article presents a high academic standard.
Good 68% — B+, 1. Have a clear understanding and description of the selected business situation.
82% B, B- 2. Have good ability to apply economic theory to analyse cases.
3. Accurate understanding of the economic concepts proposed.
4. Use economic theory to conduct an in-depth analysis of the chosen business situation, and
The explanation provided is appropriate.
5. The majority of the text is logical.
6. The explanations provided are generally broad in nature.
7. Most of the cited literature results are appropriate and formal.
8. The whole article presents a good academic standard
Moderate 53% — C+, 1. Have a clear understanding and description of the selected business situation.
67% C, C- 2. Have moderate ability to apply economic theory to analyse cases.
3. Accurate understanding of most of the economic concepts presented.
4. The selected business situation is analyzed using economic theory, but not in sufficient depth.
The explanation provided is strong.
5. Only a small portion of the lines are logical.
6. The explanations provided are not comprehensive enough.
7. Only a small portion of the cited literature is appropriate and formal.
8. Some articles show good academic standards
4
Pass 50% – D 1. Some understanding of the selected business situation, but the description lacks clarity.
52% 2. Poor ability to apply economic theory to analyze cases.
3. Some of the economic concepts proposed are somewhat understood, but their accuracy is insufficient.
4. Attempt to use economic theory to analyze the selected business situation, but the explanation is
And the explanation provided is not very reasonable.
5. The writing lacks logic, but the meaning is understandable.
6. The breadth of the explanations provided is woefully inadequate.
7. Some of the cited literature results are appropriate and have basic regularity.
8. Some articles present acceptable academic standards
Unqualified Less than O and 1. Lack of understanding of the chosen business situation and its description is extremely unclear.
50% F 2. The ability to apply economic theory to analyse cases is extremely low.
3. The understanding of the economic concepts proposed is completely wrong.
4. No attempt is made to use economic theory to analyze the selected economic problems.
5. The writing lacks logic and it is difficult to understand the intended meaning.
6. No explanation provided
7. Little or no use of literature
8. The article does not present a satisfactory academic standard
5
Peer evaluation criteria among team members
Rating Rating criteria
9 – 1. Actively collect necessary information and participate in discussions.
10 2. Demonstrate a high level of teamwork spirit.
3. Evaluate team members’ opinions very rationally, showing high analytical ability.
4. Actively participate in the preparation of oral reports.
5. Actively participate in the writing and revision of written reports.
7 – 8 1. Be more proactive in collecting necessary information and participating in discussions.
2. Demonstrate strong team spirit.
3. Rationally evaluate the opinions raised by team members and demonstrate high analytical skills.
4. Participate more actively in the preparation of oral reports.
5. Participate actively in the writing and revision of written reports.
5 -6 1. Participated in the collection and discussion of necessary data and the performance was acceptable.
2. Demonstrate acceptable teamwork spirit.
3.Commented on suggestions raised by team members, demonstrating acceptable analytical skills.
4. Participated in the preparation of oral reports and performed acceptable.
5. Participated in the writing and revision of written reports and the performance was acceptable.
3-4 1. Less participation in the collection and discussion of necessary information, and poor performance.
2. Demonstrating poor teamwork spirit.
3. Occasionally commented on the opinions raised by team members, demonstrating poor analytical skills.
4. Less participation in oral report preparation and poor performance.
5. Less involvement in the writing and revision of written reports, and poor performance.
0 -2 1 Rarely participates in the collection and discussion of necessary data, and performs extremely poorly.
2. Demonstrates extremely poor teamwork spirit.
3. Rarely comments on team members’ opinions, showing extremely poor analytical skills.
4. Rarely participated in the preparation of oral reports and performed extremely poorly.
5. Rarely participated in the writing and revision of written reports, and performed extremely poorly.