- University :Other
CRITERIA/SCALE Exemplary
(5)
Proficient
(4) Developing
(3) Emerging
(2) Not Present
(1)
Identification of construction tasks/activities for the project
(15% MARKS) An excellent critical
analysis on 15 tasks/activities to be undertaken for the project. Discussions are supported with literature. A very good analysis on 13 tasks/activities to be undertaken for the project. Discussions are somewhat supported with literature. A good analysis on below 13 tasks/activities to be undertaken for the project. Discussions are not supported with literature. A satisfactory analysis on below 13 tasks/activities to be undertaken for the project. There are no discussions for these tasks A poor analysis on tasks/activities to be undertaken for the project. There are no discussions for these tasks. No literature to support discussions of these tasks.
Team structure for the project
(20% MARKS) An excellent critical
analysis on team structure and roles of team members by linking to the project outcomes and features with a thorough discussion. Figures/tables used to assist in demonstration A very good analysis on team structure and roles of team members by linking to some project outcomes and features with a discussion. Some Figures/tables used to assist in demonstration. A good analysis on team structure and roles of team members by linking to the few project outcomes and features with few details. A satisfactory analysis on team structure and roles of team members by linking to no project outcomes and features. A poor analysis on team structure and no roles of team members identified. Roles are not linked to project outcomes and features.
Stakeholder management plan
(25% MARKS) An excellent critical
analysis on the key stakeholders of the project. Stakeholder register, power-interest matric and RACI matrix are excellently presented without errors. Discussions are excellently presented and structured. Tables/figures are used to support discussions A very good analysis on the key stakeholders of the project. Stakeholder register, power-interest matric and RACI matrix are presented with few errors. Discussions are very good and structured. Few tables/figures are used to support discussions A good analysis on the stakeholders of the project. Stakeholder register, power-interest matric and RACI matrix are presented with many errors. Some key stakeholders are missed from the analysis. Discussions are not supported with relevant tables. Many errors in the tables/figures A satisfactory analysis on the stakeholders of the project. Stakeholder register, power-interest matric and RACI matrix are presented with significant errors. Significant key stakeholders are missed from the analysis. No discussions on the tables/figures presented. Many errors in the tables/figures A poor analysis on the stakeholders of the project. Stakeholder register, power-interest matric and RACI matrix are not presented.
Communication management plan
(20% MARKS) An excellent critical
analysis on the communication plan for the project. The communication items, medium, audience, frequency, purpose and persons responsible for distributing the communication have been excellently presented without errors. Well-presented figure/table is used to assist in demonstration. There are well structure and excellent discussions on all sections of the plan A very good analysis on the communication plan for the project. The communication items, medium, audience, frequency, purpose and persons responsible for distributing the communication have been presented with few errors and ambiguity. Figure/Table is used to assist in demonstration. Few discussions on few sections of the plan A good analysis on the communication plan for the project. The communication items, medium, audience, frequency, purpose and persons responsible for distributing the communication have been presented with many errors and ambiguity. Figure/Table is used to assist in demonstration. No discussions on sections of the plan A satisfactory analysis on the communication plan for the project. The communication items, medium, audience, frequency, purpose and persons responsible for distributing the communication have been presented with significant errors and ambiguity. No figure/table is used to assist in demonstration. No discussions on sections of the plan A poor analysis on the communication plan for the project. Many sections of the plan have not been presented and discussed. No figure/table is used in demonstration
Basic Language Skills
(Usage of language and vocabular)
(10% MARKS) Pleasingly varied range of sentence structure. Vocabulary, spelling and grammar used exceptionally well.
Good range of sentence structure. Vocabulary, spelling and grammar contain a number of minor errors. The range of sentences expressed correctly is limited. Errors in vocabulary, word formation, spelling and grammar cause difficulty for the reader. Errors in sentence structure, vocabulary, spelling grammar, word formation predominate-hence preventing accurate communication. Usage of language is extremely poor
Report Writing Skills and Structure
(10 % MARKS) The reports intent is clearly communicated. Good structures and format. Logical headings. If there are any mistakes, they do not interfere with the meaning. The reports intent is clearly communicated for the most part. Clear structures are evident. There are some difficulties in understanding the intent of the report, although there are signs of meaning breaking through. The intent of the report is difficult to understand. The report is extremely difficult to understand