|
Criteria
|
Exemplary
|
Well Developed
|
In Development
|
Needs development
|
|
35
points
Select
two tools from the websites listed above.
Provide
an overview of the tools and ways to implement those tools as a
mental health specialist.
Tool
1
|
30-35
points
The
first tool is accurately and thoroughly presented. The report
provides clear and complete information about the tool itself and
insightful ways it can be implemented by a mental health
specialist. At least two sources are used, cited, and referenced
correctly.
|
22-29
points
The
first tool is accurately and presented. The report provides
adequate information about the tool and some ways it can be
implemented by a mental health specialist. At least two sources
are used, cited, and referenced with possible minor errors.
|
16-21
points
The
first tool is presented and provides some information about the
tool and vague possibilities for implementation by a mental health
specialist. One or two sources are used, cited, and referenced
with some errors.
|
0-15
points
The
first tool is included in the report but information is possibly
inaccurate and incomplete. Ways to implement the tool by a mental
health specialist are unclear or missing. Either one or no
citations and references are provided and may
contain errors.
|
|
35
Points
Select
two tools from the websites
listed above.
Provide
an overview of the tools and ways to implement those tools as a
mental health specialist.
Tool
2
|
30-35
points
The
second tool is accurately and thoroughly presented. The report
provides clear and complete information about the tool itself and
insightful ways it can be implemented by a mental health
specialist. At least two sources are used, cited, and referenced
correctly.
|
22-29
points
The
second tool is accurately and presented. The report provides
adequate information about the tool and some ways it can be
implemented by a mental health specialist. At least two sources
are used, cited, and referenced with possible minor errors.
|
16-21
points
The
second tool is presented and provides some information about the
tool and vague possibilities for implementation by a mental health
specialist. One or two sources are used, cited, and referenced
with some errors.
|
0-15
points
The
second tool is included in the report but information is possibly
inaccurate and incomplete. Ways to implement the tool by a mental
health specialist are unclear or missing. Either one or no
citations and references are provided and may
contain errors.
|
|
15
points
Structure:
Please
include a title page, the body of your paper that covers both
questions, and a reference page. All papers should include an
introduction and conclusion.
|
13-15
points
The
paper includes all five sections, well-written with clear
communication of meaning. Both questions are adequately addressed.
|
10-12
points
The
paper includes all five sections, is well-written, but lacks some
clarity of meaning. Both sections are included in the paper and at
least one is adequately addressed.
|
7-9
points
The
paper includes at least four of the required sections. Writing is
somewhat organized some lack of clarity of meaning is present.
Both questions are included but are incompletely addressed
|
0-6
points
The
paper includes three or less of the required sections. The writing
is unclear in meaning and one question is incompletely addressed.
|
|
10
points.
Writing
Mechanics and APA Grammar and Format:
Papers
are written using APA 6th
edition formatting and writing skills.
|
9-10
points
No
more than three grammatical, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA
errors. Clarity of paper was not influenced by the errors.
|
7-8
points
More
than three grammatical, spelling, punctuation, or APA errors.
Clarity of paper was not strongly influenced by the errors.
|
4-6
points
More
than three grammatical, spelling, punctuation, or APA errors that
had a negative influence on the clarity of the paper.
|
0-3
points
More
than three grammatical, spelling, punctuation, or APA errors that
had a strong negative influence on the clarity of the paper.
|
|
5
points
Sources:
Two
additional professional sources are used to support points in
|
5
points
Two
or more professional sources (e.g., journal article, textbook)
used to thoroughly support ideas, correctly cited and documented
in the references list and
|
4
points
Two
professional sources were used to adequately support ideas and was
documented in the reference list. Citations and references contain
some errors.
|
3
points
One
or two sources, not professional sources, were used to support the
information and documented in the reference list. Errors in
citation and/or referencing.
|
0-2
points
There
were none or one source. Ideas were insufficiently supported.
Citation and reference were incomplete or absent.
|
|
Total: 100 points
|
|
|
|
|
